PLUS-M™ Publications and Abstracts

A compilation of publications, abstracts, and other press related to the development of PLUS-M™ is provided below. Links to materials are provided, when available. 

Published Articles

• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, et al. Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). PM&R. 2023;15(4):456-473. (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• McDonald CL, Kahn A, Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ. Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users. Disabil Rehabil. 2023. Online ahead of print. (Pubmed link)
  
• Morgan SJ, Askew RL, Hafner BJ. Measurements of best, worst, and average socket comfort are more reliable than current socket comfort in established lower limb prosthesis users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022;103(6):1201-1204. (Pubmed link)
• Balkman GS, Samejima S, Fujimoto K, Hafner BJ. Japanese translation and linguistic validation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Prosthet Orthot Int 2022;46(1):75-83. (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
  
• Morgan SJ, Liljenquist KS, Kajlich A, Gailey RS, Amtmann D, Hafner BJ. Mobility with a lower limb prosthesis: experiences of users with high levels of functional ability. Disabil Rehabil. 202244(13):3236-3244. (Pubmed link).
  
• Amtmann D, Kim J, Bamer AM, Bocell FD, Chung H, Park R, Salem R, Hafner BJ. A comparison of computerized adaptive testing and fixed-length short forms for the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™). Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(5):476-482. (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Kelly VE, Morgan SJ, Amtmann D, Salem R, Hafner BJ. Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40(1):96-103. (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Hafner BJ, Spaulding SE, Salem R, Morgan SJ, Gaunaurd IA, Gailey RS. Prosthetists' perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: long-term effects of focused continuing education. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2017; 41(3):266-273 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Hafner BJ, Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, Amtmann D, Salem R, Gailey RS. Construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in adults with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017; 98(2):277-85 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Morgan SJ, Friedly JL, Amtmann D, Salem R, Hafner BJ. A cross-sectional assessment of factors related to pain intensity and pain interference in lower limb prosthesis users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(1):105-113 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ, Askew RA, Salem R. Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications. J Rehabili Res Dev. 2016; 53(6):797-812 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ, Abrahamson DC, Amtmann D. Characterizing mobility from the prosthetic limb user’s perspective: use of focus groups to guide development of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Prosthet Orthot Intl, 2016; 40(5):582-90. (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Morgan SJ, Kelly VE, Amtmann D, Salem R, Hafner BJ. Self-reported cognitive concerns in people with lower limb loss. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016; 97(6):912-8 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Amtmann D, Morgan SJ, Kim J, Hafner BJ. Health-related profiles of people with lower limb loss. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015; 96(8):1474-83 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Gaunaurd I, Spaulding S, Amtmann D, Salem R, Gailey R, Morgan S, Hafner B. Use of and Confidence Administering Outcome Measures among Clinical Prosthetists: Results from a National Survey and Mixed-Methods Training Program. Prosthet Orthot Intl, 2015; 39(4):314-21 (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)
• Morgan SJ, Amtmann D, Abrahamson DC, Kajlich AJ, Hafner BJ. Use of cognitive interviews in the development of the PLUS-M item bank. Qual Life Res, 2014; 23(6):1767-75. (Pubmed link) (Direct link to article)

Published Abstracts

• Hafner B, Morgan S, Amtmann D, Bamer A, Balkman G, Gailey R, Gaunaurd I, Kristal A, Ikeda A, Fergason J. Enhancing the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) to measure active prosthesis users. 2020; 32(2-S1):54. (link to proceedings)
• Balkman G, Samejima S, Aoki D, Hafner BJ. Japanese translation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2018;1(2). 2018.
• Morgan SJ, Askew RL, Salem R, Hafner BJ. Does asking a prosthesis user about best, worst, or average socket comfort provide a more stable assessment of socket fit than current comfort? American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP) 43rd Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, New Orleans, LA, February 12-17, 2018.
• Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ, Askew RL, Salem R. Psychometric properties of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications. American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP) 42nd Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, Orlando, FL, March 9-12, 2016.
• Amtmann D, Kim J, Chung H, Park R, Salem R, and Hafner BJ. Comparison of Computerized Adaptive Testing and Fixed-Length Short Forms of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™). International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) 22nd Annual Conference. Vancouver, Canada, October 21-24, 2015.
• Gaunaurd I, Gailey R, Salem R, Hafner B. Construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Lyon, France, June 22-25, 2015.
• Spaulding S, Gaunaurd I, Gailey R, Morgan S, Amtmann D, Salem R, Hafner B. Prosthetists’ confidence administering outcome measures. Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Lyon, France, June 22-25, 2015.
• Hafner B, Morgan S, Askew R. Reliability of self-reported outcome measures in people with lower limb loss: implications to clinical care and research. Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Lyon, France, June 22-25, 2015.
• Morgan S, Askew R, Hafner B. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration for four self-report instruments used in prosthetic clinical care. Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of the International Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Lyon, France, June 22-25, 2015.
• Morgan SJ, Kelly VE, Salem R, Hafner BJ. Self-reported cognitive concerns in people with lower limb loss. Proceedings of the American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP) 41th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, New Orleans, LA, February 18-21, 2015.
• Amtmann D, Abrahamson D, Morgan S, Salem R, Askew R, Gailey R, Gaunaurd I, Kajlich A, Hafner B. The PLUS-M: item bank of mobility for prosthetic limb users. Proceedings of the ISOQOL 20th Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, October 15-18, 2014
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Kajlich AJ, Salem R. Normative PEQ-MS and ABC scores among persons with lower limb loss. American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP) 39th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, Orlando, FL, February 20-23, 2013.
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Kajlich AJ, Salem R. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System profiles of persons with lower limb loss. American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP) 39th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, Orlando, FL, February 20-23, 2013.
• Morgan SJ, Abrahamson DC, Gailey RS, Amtmann D, and Hafner BJ. The use of cognitive interviews to evaluate item content in a prosthetic mobility outcome measure. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress, Hyderabad, India, February 4-7, 2013.
• Amtmann D, Askew RL, Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, and Hafner BJ. Empirical support for distinct mobility groups of prosthetic users. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress, Hyderabad, India, February 4-7, 2013.
• Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Gailey RS, Amtmann D, and Hafner BJ. The use of focus groups to aid in the development of a mobility outcome measure. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress, Hyderabad, India, February 4-7, 2013.
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Kajlich AJ, Salem R. Large-scale administration of shortened versions of the Prosthesis-Evaluation Questionnaire Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS) and Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) in persons with lower limb loss. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress, Hyderabad, India, February 4-7, 2013.
• Hafner BJ, Amtmann D, Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Kajlich AJ, Salem R. Health profiles of persons with lower limb loss. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress, Hyderabad, India, February 4-7, 2013. 
• Amtmann D, Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Salem R, Askew RL, and Hafner BJ. The development of the PLUS-M, a new measure of mobility for prosthetic limb users. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO) World Congress, Hyderabad, India, February 4-7, 2013.
• Amtmann D, Abrahamson DA, Morgan S, Salem R, Askew RL, Hafner B. Symptoms and quality of life indicators of persons with lower limb loss. ISOQOL 19th Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary, October 24-27, 2012. 
• Abrahamson DC, Morgan SJ, Amtmann D, Hafner BJ: Understanding the effect of the environment on mobility with a lower limb prosthesis  38th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists (AAOP), Atlanta, GA, March 21-24, 2012.  

Other Press

• High-function prosthesis suers inform new PLUS-M items. O&P Edge. December 27, 2020.
• American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP). Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) How-to video and instrument review. December 12, 2017 (Youtube video) (Instrument Review).
• Pousett B. Motivating patients, improving care: a case study of outcome measures in practice. O&P Edge. September, 2017.
• Study compares advantages, disadvantages of computerized adaptive tests, short forms. O&P Edge. September, 2017.
• White, A. Three tips to successfully evaluate a patient with limb loss. Medbridge. April 2, 2017.
• Stevens P and Wurdeman S. Clinical outcomes and practice guidelines for lower limb amputees. California Orthopaedic Association Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA, May 18-21, 2017.
• Study supports validity of PLUS-M. O&P Edge. September 7, 2016.
• Training affects confidence and use of outcome measures. O&P Business News. March 2016.
• OPIE to integrate the University of Washington's Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). Press release. March 2016.
• Prosthesis users' input guides development of mobility measure. O&P Edge. May 2015
• Umbrell C. Self-evaluation. O&P Almanac. April 2015
• Spaulding S, Morgan S, Hafner B. Prosthetic limb users survey of mobility: Researchers develop self-report instrument for measuring mobility of adults with lower-limb amputation. O&P Almanac, 63(7): 34-37, 2014
• Spridgen A. AOPA 2013 World Congress. O&P Edge. November 2013
• Agrawal V. Outcome measures: avenues for optomizing prosthetic performance. O&P Edge. October 2013
• Hawthorne K. Outcome measures: are we there yet? O&P Edge. March 2013
• Calabro A. NIH-funded project developing improved outcome measurement systems in O&P. O&P Business News. June 2011. 
• Otto JP. Outcomes project explores user-friendly ways to measure mobility. O&P Edge. March 2011.

PLUS-M in Other Articles

In Press

• Alavi T, Jalali M, Farahmand B, Babaee T. Prosthesis and health-related factors of mobility in people with nontraumatic unilateral transtibial amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024.Online ahead of print. (Pubmed link)
• Ferrell-Olson J, Hafner BJ, Sawers A. Evaluating fall event definitions relative to lower limb prosthesis users' lived experiences. Disabil Rehabil. 2024:1-8. Online ahead of print. (Pubmed link)
• Morgan SJ, Friedly JL, Nelson IK, Rosen RE, Humbert AT, Hafner BJ. The effects of microprocessor prosthetic knee use in early rehabilitation: A pilot randomized controlled trial. PM&R. 2025. Online ahead of print. (Pubmed link)
• Page BJ, Sheridan GA, Greenstein MD, Hoellwarth JS, Reif TJ, Rozbruch SR. PLUS-M mobility values of osseointegration patients: how do osseointegration limb replacement prosthesis users compare to traditional socket amputee prosthesis users? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024. Online ahead of print. (Pubmed link)
• Pousett BM, Harasym CC, Rapaport MS, Moe DW, Miller WC. The relationship between socket comfort, pain, and mobility over treatment milestones for individuals with lower-limb loss. J Prosthet Orthot. 2025; online ahead of print (link)
• Sawers A, Fatone S. The relationship of hip strength to walking and balance performance in unilateral lower limb prosthesis users differs by amputation level. PM&R. 2024. Online ahead of print. (Pubmed link)
  
  2025
  
  
• Balasubramanian A, Mysior CR, So N, Zhu AC. Peripheral nerve stimulation and improved functional outcomes in a prosthetic user: A case report. A A Pract. 2025;19(2):e01916. (Pubmed link)
• Benner S, Heuser PP, Rüsseler M, Herrmann E, Harbering J, Schippers P, Hoffmann R, Fischer S. The misleading terminology of minor amputation of the lower limb. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025;51(1):80. (Pubmed link)
• Finco MG, McDonald CL, Moudy SC. Does Terminology Matter? Perspectives From people With limb difference, clinicians, and researchers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025;106(1):26-36. (Pubmed link)
  
• McDonald CL, Balkmann GS, Hafner BJ. How do users define success with a lower limb prosthesis? A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2025;47(3):736-50. (Pubmed link)
• Secco MZ, Balbi LL, Pinheiro BB, Pereira MSC, Barros ARB, Fonseca MCR. Translation, cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese, and validation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2025;49(1):133-138. (Pubmed link)
• Tobaigy M, Hafner BJ, Hsieh K, Sawers A. Falls perceived as significant by lower limb prosthesis users are generally associated with fall consequences rather than circumstances. Disabil Rehabil. 2025;47(1):252-8. (Pubmed link)
• Vetchy V, Trost C, Windhager R, Hobusch G. Secondary amputation: a qualitative study of quality of life in patients after primary limb salvage surgery and after later ablative sarcoma treatment. J Rehabil Med. 2025;57:jrm34888. (Pubmed link)
• Yerli S, Erbahçeci F, Kerem Günel M. Effect of pain on activity and participation in individuals with unilateral lower-extremity amputation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2025;49(1):7-13. (Pubmed link)
  
  2024
  
  
• Awad ME, Melton D, Shaw KG, Lev G, Gaffney BMM, Christiansen CL, Stoneback JW. How comprehensive and efficient are patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with lower extremity amputation undergoing implantation of osseointegrated bone anchored limbs? J Bone Joint Surg. 2024;12(3). (Pubmed link)
• Fylstra BL, England DL, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. Creating Adjusted Scores Targeting mobiLity Empowerment (CASTLE 1): determination of normative mobility scores after lower limb amputation for each year of adulthood. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(9):1904-1910. (Pubmed link)
• Gjøvaag T, Reed-Schwanborg L, Solberg MB, Langseth II, Starholm IM. Self-reported prosthetic mobility of lower limb prosthetic users in Norway. Gait Posture. 2024;113:74-5. (link)
• Hjermundrud V, Hilding GF, Gjøvaag T. Four weeks of inpatient comprehensive prosthetic rehabilitation achieves contrasting results in different groups of prosthetic users. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024;48(6):634-45. (Pubmed link)
• Kaufman KR, Bernhardt K, Murphy S, Archer M, Brandt JM, Bowman L, Phillips B. Creation of a limb loss and preservation registry for improving the quality of patient care in the United States. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024;6(3):100356. (Pubmed link)
• Klenow TD, Lundstrom RL, Morris A, Patterson S, Simpson C, Trejo EG, Kannenberg A. An enhancement of the Genium™ microprocessor-controlled knee improves safety and different aspects of the perceived prosthetic experience for unilateral and bilateral users. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024;5:1342370. (Pubmed link)
  
• Kuo PB, Lehavot K, Thomas RM, Dashtestani K, Peterson AC, Korpak AM, Turner AP, Williams RM, Czerniecki JM, Norvell DC, Littman AJ. Gender differences in prosthesis-related outcomes among veterans: Results of a national survey of U.S. veterans. PM&R. 2024;16(3):239-49. (Pubmed link)
  
• Lee SP, Maluotoga M, Thind R, Lindsay L, Bhatta T, Miller CA. Utilization and perception of peer-support after lower limb loss in the United States: Potential benefits on mobility outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;105(5):939-946.e3. (Pubmed link)
• Mueller E, Major MJ. The effects of slope-adaptive prosthetic ankle-feet on sloped gait performance and quality in unilateral transtibial prosthesis users: A scoping review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2024; 36(3):e49-e59. (link)
• Mohammed NB, Kahtan YY. A study of the effect of the difference in energy stored in two prosthetic feet made of carbon fiber amputated below the knee on the efficiency of walking. Al-Nahrain J Eng Sci. 2024;27(1):97-108. (link)
• Nugent K, Viana R, Payne MW, Unger J, Hunter SW. Understanding the multidimensionality of a concern for falling in people with unilateral transtibial amputation: a cross-sectional study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2024;47(4):268-75. (Pubmed link)
• Pousett BM, Harasym CC, Rapaport MS, Richardson T, Spellen J, Moe DW, Miller WC. Detecting changes in comfort, pain, and mobility over clinical milestones for individuals with lower limb loss. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2024;7(1):43890. (Pubmed link)
• Requena C, Bascou J, Loiret I, Bonnet X, Thomas-Pohl M. Duraffourg C, Calistri L, Pillet H. Effectiveness of a new microprocessor-controlled knee–ankle–foot system for transfemoral amputees: A randomized controlled trial. Prosthesis 2024;6:1591-1606. (link)
  
• Secco MZ, Balbi LL, Pereira MSC, Santos Costa W, Barros A, Registro Fonseca MC. Convergent construct validity of the Brazilian version of the Houghton scale. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024;48(5):546-50. (Pubmed link)
  
  2023
  
  
• Bajracharya AR, Seng-iad S, Sasaki K, Guerra G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nepali version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™/NEPALI-12SF) in lower limb prosthesis users. Can J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 6(1):1-6. (Link to article)
• Bekrater-Bodmann R, Kehl I, Hafner BJ, Ranker A, Giordano A, Franchignoni F. Rasch validation of the German translation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility short forms in people with lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023;47(5):552-557. (Pubmed link)
• England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. GGEM: Gender, Geography, and EMployment differences based on mobility levels among lower limb prosthesis users living in the United States. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023;47(3):265-71. (Pubmed link)
• Gailey RS, Kristal A, Al Muderis M, Lučarević J, Clemens S, Applegate EB, Isaacson BM, Pasquina PF, Symsack A, Gaunaurd IA. Comparison of prosthetic mobility and balance in transfemoral amputees with bone-anchored prosthesis vs. socket prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023;47(2):130-6. (Pubmed link)
• Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, Balkman GS, et al. Modifying the five-time sit-to-stand test to allow use of the upper limbs: Assessing initial evidence of construct validity among lower limb prosthesis users. Plos One. 2023; 18(2):e0279543. (Direct link to article)
  
• Hagberg K, Zugner R, Thomsen P, Tranberg R. Daily activity of individuals with an amputation above the knee as recorded from the nonamputated limb and the prosthetic limb. J Meas Phys Behav. 2023; 6(3):223-232. (Link to article)
• Madroñero-Mariscal R, Palmero-Valdez N, González-Parra E, Izquierdo RR, Marcelino R, Llaneras MP, Nasarre B, Rueda AF, López-Dolado E, Melton DH. Design of a challenging prosthetic fitting process and rehabilitation training program to achieve functionality in a complex quadruple amputee. Arch Clin Med Case Rep. 2023; 7(1):44-57. (Link to article)
• Miller TA, Paul R, Forthofer M, Wurdeman SR. Stability and Falls Evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 2): Reduced functional mobility is associated with a history of injurious falls in lower limb prosthesis users. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;66(4):101679. (Pubmed link)
• Nickel E, Cataldo A, Walker N, et al. Pilot test of a definitive prosthetic socket made with 3D printing technology. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(1):55-60. (Link to article) (Pubmed link)
• Russell Esposito E, Hansen AH, Slater BS, Major MJ, Muschler K, Ikeda AJ, Erbes C. Footwear limitations in women prosthesis users relate to more than preference. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023;47(5):511-8. (Pubmed link)
• Sawers A, Fatone S. After scaling to body size hip strength of the residual limb exceeds that of the intact limb among unilateral lower limb prosthesis users. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):50. (Pubmed link)
• Seth M, Horne JR, Pholig RT, Sions JM. Pain, balance-confidence, functional mobility, and reach are associated with risk of recurrent falls among adults with lower-limb amputation. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023; 5(4):100309. (Pubmed link)
• Tobaigy M, Hafner BJ, Sawers A. The number of falls recalled in the past year and balance confidence predict the frequency of injurious falls by unilateral lower limb prosthesis users. PM&R. 2023;15(4):426-36. (Pubmed link)
• Yosmaoglu S, Yazicioglu G, Demir Y, Aydemir K, Yosmaoğlu HB. Validity and reliability of Turkish transcultural adaptation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. Prosthet Orthot Int 2023; 47(2):189-193. (Pubmed link)
  
  2022
  
  
• Anderst W, Fiedler G, Onishi K, McKernan G, Gale T, Paulus P. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes. Trials 2022; 23(1):299. (Pubmed link)
• Bell EM, Carrignan J, Collier DK, Yan JS, Shim JK. Identifying prosthetic capabilities that define functionality of individuals With amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34:e9-19. (link)
• Clemens S, Gaunaurd I, Raya M, Kirk-Sanchez N, Klute G, Gailey R. Using theoretical frameworks to examine fall history and associated prosthetic mobility in people with nondysvascular lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2022; 46(5):484-490. (Pubmed link)
• England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): Normative mobility values for lower limb prosthesis users of varying age, etiology, and amputation level. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 101(9):850-858. (link)
• Fiedler G, Singh A, McKernan G. Does socket liner material affect clinical outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users? Insights from a randomized control trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022;46(2):199-201. (Pubmed link)
• Hahn A, Bueschges S, Prager M, Kannenberg A. The effect of microprocessor controlled exo-prosthetic knees on limited community ambulators: systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44(24):7349-7367. (Pubmed link)
• Lee SP, Bonczyk A, Dimapilis MK, Partridge S, Ruiz S, Chien LC, Sawers A. Direction of attentional focus in prosthetic training: Current practice and potential for improving motor learning in individuals with lower limb loss. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0262977. (Pubmed link)
• Morgan SJ, Rowe K, Fitting CC, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures for people with lower limb amputation: A survey of prosthetic practitioners in the United States. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 103(9):1786-1797. (Pubmed link)
  
• Nugent K, Payne MW, Viana R, Unger J, Hunter SW. A concern for falling impacts quality of life for people with a lower limb amputation. Int J Rehabil Res 2022; 45(3):253-9. (Pubmed link)
• Sawers A, McDonald CL, Hafner BJ. A survey for characterizing details of fall events experienced by lower limb prosthesis users. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0272082. (Pubmed link)
• Sawers A, Hafner BJ. Performance-based balance tests, combined with the number of falls recalled in the past year, predicts the incidence of future falls in established unilateral transtibial prosthesis users. PM&R. 2022;14(4):434-44. (Pubmed link)
  
• Sawers A, Fatone S. Normalization alters the interpretation of hip strength in established unilateral lower limb prosthesis users. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022;97:105702. (Pubmed link)
• Tobaigy M, Hafner BJ, Sawers A. Recalled number of falls in the past year-combined with perceived mobility-predicts the incidence of future falls in unilateral lower limb prosthesis users. Phys Ther. 2022;102(2). (Pubmed link)
• Weber EL, Stevens PM, England DL, Swilley VD, and Wurdeman SR. Microprocessor feet improve prosthetic mobility and physical function relative to non-microprocessor feet. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022; 9:20556683221113320. (Pubmed link) (Link to article)
  
  2021
  
  
• Altenburg B, Ernst M, Maciejasz P, Schmalz T, Braatz F, Gerke H, Bellman M. Effects of a prosthetic foot with increased coronal adaptability on cross-slope walking. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2021; 4(1) No 7:1-11. (link)
• Anderson CB, Wurdeman SR, Miller MJ, Christiansen CL, Kittelson AJ. Development of a physical mobility prediction model to guide prosthetic rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2021; 45(3):268-75. (Pubmed Link)
• Bekrater-Bodmann R. Factors associated with prosthesis embodiment and its importance for prosthetic satisfaction in lower limb amputees. Front Neurorobot. 2021; 14:604376. (link)
• Chang SR, Miller CH, Kaluf B. Effects of hydraulic ankle-foot prostheses on gait in individuals with transtibial limb loss: a scoping review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2):101-109. (link)
  
• Cho E, Wakeling JM, Pousett B, Pollock CL. Mapping of electrodermal activity (EDA) during outdoor community-level mobility tasks in individuals with lower-limb amputation. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 2021; 8:20556683211006837. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
  Kannenberg A, Morris AR, Hibler KD. Free-living user perspectives on musculoskeletal pain and patient-reported mobility with passive and powered prosthetic ankle-foot components: a pragmatic, exploratory cross-sectional study. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021; 2:805151. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• Kaluf B, Cox C, Shoemaker E. Hydraulic- and microprocessor-controlled ankle-foot prostheses for limited community ambulators with unilateral transtibial amputation: pilot study. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(4):294-303. (link)
• Sawers A, Kim J, Balkman G, Hafner BJ. Interrater and test-retest reliability of performance-based clinical tests administered to established users of lower limb prostheses. Phys Ther. 2020;100(7):1206-16. (Pubmed link)
• Schack J, Mirtaheri P, Steen H and Gjovaag T. Assessing mobility for persons with lower limb amputation: the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test with the inclusion of two novel conditions. Disabil Rehabil. 2021; 43(9):1323-1332. (Pubmed link)
• Sions JM, Beisheim EH, Seth M. Selecting, administering, and interpreting outcome measures among adults with lower-limb loss: An update for clinicians. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2020; 8(3):92-109. (Pubmed link)
• Smolle MA, Leithner A, Kapper M, Demmer G, Trost C, Bergovec M et al. Complications, mobility, and quality of life in ankle sarcoma patients. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-b(3):553-61. (Pubmed link)
• Stevens P. Prioritizing primary outcomes in prosthetic rehabilitation: observations from recent evidence. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2):82-87. (link)
• von Kaeppler EP, Hetherington A, Donnelley CA, Ali SH, Shirley C, Challa ST et al. Impact of prostheses on quality of life and functional status of transfemoral amputees in Tanzania. Afr J Disabil 2021; 10:839. (Pubmed link)
• Walker J, Marable WR, Smith C, Sigurjonsson BP, Atlason IF, Johannesson A. Clinical outcome of transfemoral direct socket interface (part 2). Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2021; 4(1) No 6:1-12. (link)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 6): Mobility, satisfaction, and quality of life among long-term dysvascular/diabetic prosthesis users—results of a cross-sectional analysis. J Prostet Orthot. 2021; 33(3):161-167. (link)
• Yildiz NT, Kocaman H, Yazıcıoğlu. Outcome measures used in lower extremity amputation: Review of clinical use and psychometric properties. J Surg Med. 2021; 5(5):544-549. (Link to article)
  
  2020
  
  
• Anderson S, Ridgewell E, Dillon M. The effect of participation in a mobility clinic on self-reported mobility and quality of life in people with lower limb amputation: A pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020; 44(4):202-7. (Pubmed link)
• Andronic O, Boeni T, Burkhard MD, et al. Modifications of the pirogoff amputation technique in adults: A retrospective analysis of 123 cases. J Orthop. 2020; 18: 5-12. (Pubmed link)
• Campbell JH, Stevens PM, Wurdeman SR. OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020; 7:2055668320968476. (Pubmed link)
• Kaluf B, Duncan A, Bridges W. Comparative effectiveness of microprocessor-controlled and carbon-fiber energy-storing-and-returning prosthetic feet in persons with unilateral transtibial amputation: patient-reported outcome measures. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(4):214-221. (link)
• Kim JH, Hong YJ, Kim YR, Lee GP. Effect of an intensive rehabilitation program on physical activity and wearing satisfaction in traumatic lower limb amputees: a retrospective study. PNF and Movement. 2020; 18(3):453-463. (link)
• Miller KT, Russell M, Jenks T, Surratt K, Poretti K, Eigenbrot SS, Akins JS, Major MJ. The feasibility and validity of a wearable sensor system to assess the stability of high-functioning lower-limb prosthesis users. J Prostet Orthot. 2020; 33(3):213-222. (link)
• Sawers A and Hafner BJ. Using clinical balance tests to assess fall risk among established unilateral lower limb prosthesis users: Cutoff scores and associated validity indices. PM&R. 2020; 12(1):16-25. (Pubmed Link)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM and Campbell JH. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 4): Classification tree analysis for probability of lower limb prosthesis user functional potential. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020; 15(2):211-218. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM and Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of amputees (MAAT 3): Matching individuals based on comorbid health reveals improved function for above-knee prosthesis users with microprocessor knee technology. Assist Technol. 2020; 32(5):236-242. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
  
  2019
  
  
• Fiedler G, Kutina K. Feasibility of a mobile feedback system for gait retraining in people with lower limb loss-A technical note. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:2055668318813682. (Pubmed link)
• Davie-Smith F, Paul L, Stuart W, Kennon B, Young R, Wyke S. The influence of socio-economic deprivation on mobility, participation, and quality of life following major lower extremity amputation in the West of Scotland. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57:554-60. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• Karatzios C, Loiret I, Luthi F, Leger B, Le Carre J, Saubade M, Muff G, Beaim C. Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019; 62(3):142-8. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• McDonald CL, Cheever SM, Morgan SJ, Hafner BJ. Prosthetic limb user experiences with crossover feet: a pilot focus group study to explore outcomes that matter. J Prostet Orthot. 2019; 31(2):121-32. (link)
• McMurtry S, Fiedler G. Comparison of lower limb segment forces during running on artificial turf and natural grass. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:2055668319835701. (Pubmed link)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM and Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 5): Impact of five common prosthetic ankle-foot categories for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019; 6:1-8 (full article link)
  
  2018
  
  
• Barnett CT, Brown OH, Biesel MM, Marcus JM, DeAsha AR, Struzenberger G. Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation and lower activity levels walk more quickly when using a hydraulically articulating versus rigidly attached prosthetic ankle-foot device. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(3):158-164. (link)
• Clemens SM, Gailey RS, Bennett CL, Pasquina PF, Kirk-Sanchez NJ, Gaunaurd IA. The Component Timed-Up-and-Go test: The utility and psychometric properties of using a mobile application to determine prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputations. Clin Rehabil. 2018; 32(3):388-397. (Pubmed link)
• Hawkins EJ, Riddick W. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of clinical performance-based outcome measures of walking for individuals with lower limb amputations: A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2018; 98(12):1037-1045. (Pubmed link)
• Koehler-McNicholas SR, Savvas Slater BC, Koester K, et al. Bimodal ankle-foot prosthesis for enhanced standing stability. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0204512. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• Morgan SJ, McDonald CL, Halsne EG, Cheever SM, Salem R, Kramer PA, Hafner BJ. Laboratory- and community-based health outcomes in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: A randomized crossover trial. PLOS One. 2018; 13(2):e0189652. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• Sawers A and Hafner BJ. Narrowing beam-walking is a clinically feasible approach for assessing balance ability in lower-limb prosthesis users. J Rehabil Med. 2018; 50: 457-64. (Pubmed Link) (full article link)
• Sawers A and Hafner BJ. A study to assess whether fixed-width beam walking provides sufficient challenge to assess balance ability across lower limb prosthesis users. Clin Rehabil. 2018; 32: 483-92. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
• Shepherd MK, Azocar AF, Major MJ, Rouse EJ. Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(1):99. (Pubmed link)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees II: Comorbidities and mobility in lower limb prosthesis users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(11):782-8. (Pubmed link) (full article link)
  
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM and Campbell JH. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT I): Quality of life and satisfaction are strongly related to mobility for patients with a lower limb prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Oct;42(5):498-503. (Pubmed link) (link to publication
  
  2017
  
  
• Fiedler G, Johnson MS. Correlation of transtibial prosthetic alignment quality and step-by-step variance of gait. J Prosthet Orthot. 2017; 29(1):19-25. (link)
• Frontera WR, Bean JF, Damiano D, Ehrlich-Jones L, Fried-Oken M, Jette A, Jung R, Lieber RL, Malec JF, Mueller MJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Tansey KE, Thompson A. Rehabilitation research at the National Institutes of Health: Moving the field forward (Executive Summary). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 96(4):211-20. (Pubmed link)
  
• Mileusnic MP, Hahn A, Reiter S. Effects of a novel microprocessor-controlled knee, Kenevo, on the safety, mobility, and satisfaction of lower-activity patients with transfemoral amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2017; 29(4):198-205. (link)
  
  2016
  
  
• Agrawal V. Clinical outcome measures for rehabilitation of amputees - a review. Phys Med Rehabil Int. 2016;3(2):1-4.
• Fiedler G, Zhang X. Quantifying accommodation to prosthesis interventions in persons with lower limb loss. Gait Posture. 2016; 50:14-6. (Pubmed link)
• Orendurff MS, Raschke SU, Winder L, Moe D, Boone DA, Kobayashi T. Functional level assessment of individuals with transtibial limb loss: evaluation in the clinical setting versus objective community ambulatory activity. J Rehabil Assist Tech Eng. 2016; 3(1):1-6. (Pubmed link)
  
  2014
  
  
• Heinemann AW, Connelly L, Ehrlich-Jones L, Fatone S. Outcome instruments for prosthetics: clinical applications. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014; 25(1):179-98. (Pubmed Link)

PLUS-M in Other Abstracts & Presentations

2024

• Castleberry TJ, England DL, Fylstra BL, Wurdeman SR. Individuals in warmer climate regions do not report worse socket comfort. J Prosthet Orthot. 2024; 36(2S):44. (link to proceedings)
• Fylstra BL, Saenz S, Hafner BJ, Wurdeman SR. Response probabilities of PLUS-M scores for individuals with lower limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2024; 36(2S):30. (link to proceedings)
• Lloyd AM, Dyreson MPL, Walker NR, McCracken PJ, Looft JM, Koehler-McNicholas SR, Iversen EK, Hansen AH. User experience with a passive slope-adaptive ankle prosthesis. J Prosthet Orthot. 2024; 36(2S):34. (link to proceedings)

2023

• Alsamdani Y, Gaunaurd I, Symsack A, Clemens S, Lucarevic J, Bennett C, Isaacson B, Pasquina P, Gailey R. Changes in mobility and gait quality for Veterans with lower-limb loss who completed the DoD/VA mobile device outcomes based rehabilitation program: Pilot study. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):20. (link to proceedings)
• Burgess L, Boobier C. A review of outcome measures for patients with lower limb loss undergoing out-patient prosthetic rehabilitation – consideration of clinically meaningful change. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 47(S1):88. (link to proceedings)
• Calistri L, Klotz R, Loiret I, Thomas-Pohl M, Permentiers I, Duraffourg C. Subischial vs ischial containment sockets: a multcentre randomized cross-over trial to assess comfort and mobility in ecologic daily life situations. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 47(S1):204. (link to proceedings)
• Castro M, Carvalho V, Antunes I. Technology-based assessment of transtibial prosthesis user’s functionality and comparison with traditional methods – a case study. J Rehabil Assist Tech Eng. 2023 AOPA Supplement. (link to proceedings)
• Clemens SM, Kershaw KN, McDonald CL, Darter BJ, Bursac Z, Garcia SJ, Rossi MD, Lee SP. Disparities in functional recovery after lower-limb amputation are associated with full-time employment and self-efficacy. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):26. (link to proceedings)
• Clemens S, Kershaw K, Lee SP. Known racial/ethnic disparities in lower limb amputation rates in the U.S. persist into functional recovery after amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 47(S1):202. (link to proceedings)
• Finco G, McDonald C, Moudy S. Prospective fall risk measures in people used a lower-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Assist Tech Eng. 2023 AOPA Supplement. (link to proceedings)
• Fylstra BL, England DL, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. Lifetime mobility values following lower-limb loss. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):31. (link to proceedings)
• Gates DH, Nolasco L, Wensman J, Gutierrez T, Avalos M, Rosenblatt NJ. Preliminary findings from a clinical trial of adjustable volume transfemoral sockets. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):32. (link to proceedings)
• Ghidini C, Favier C, Sharma SK, Erenstone J, Maharjan S, Bull A. Validation of an affordable prosthetic silicone linear to enable adoption of Total Surface Bearing sockets in resource limited environments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 47(S1):275. (link to proceedings)
• Kannenberg A, O'Brien S, Freigang P. Use of outcomes to achieve the impossible: Approval of MPK in K2 patients. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):37. (link to proceedings)
• Kannenberg A, O'Brien S, Freigang P. Use of outcomes to achieve the impossible: Approval of MPK in K2 patients. J Rehabil Assist Tech Eng. 2023 AOPA Supplement. (link to proceedings)
• Klenow T, Morris A, Lundstrom R. Narrowing the performance gap for bilateral transfemoral prosthesis users with their unilateral peers using advanced microprocessor knee technology. J Rehabil Assist Tech Eng. 2023 AOPA Supplement. (link to proceedings)
• McDonald CL, Kahn A, Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ. Secondary prosthesis use among lower-limb prosthesis users. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):42. (link to proceedings)
• Miller TA, England DL, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. OASIS 2: Mobility differences with specific prosthetic feet across procedure codes. J Prosthet Orthot. 2023; 35(2S):50. (link to proceedings)
• Pousett B, Moe D, Rapaport M, Richardson T, Spellen J, Harasym C, Miller WC. Measuring changes in mobility, comfort and pain over prosthetic treatment milestones for individuals with lower limb loss. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 47(S1):92. (link to proceedings)
• Zügner R. Relation between the kinematic gait profiles score and daily activity data in individuals with amputation above the knee. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 47(S1):102. (link to proceedings)

2022

• Clemens S, Kershaw K, Ho S, Shih H, Nagode N, Rossi M, Lee P. A pilot study indicating women and people of color are exhibiting poorer prosthetic outcomes after lower-limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):23. (link to proceedings)
• Leister KR, Heffernan K, Miller T, Barreira TV. COVID-19's impact on physical activity and mental health among individuals with amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):6. (link to proceedings)
• Morgan SJ, Friedly JL, Nelson IK, Rosen RE, Humbert AT, Hafner BJ. Effects of microprocessor knee use in early rehabilitation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):39. (link to proceedings)
• Morgenroth DC, Halsne EG, Turner AT, Ruxin TR, Hansen, AH, Walker NR, Behrens KM, Lloyd AM, Childers WL, Brousseau L, Caputo JM, Curran CS, Hafner BJ. A multisite randomized crossover study of a "test-drive strategy" for prosthetic foot prescription. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):40. (link to proceedings)
• Morris A, Kannenberg A, Hibler K. Pain and patient-reported mobility with powered versus passive prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):41. (link to proceedings)
• Walker NR, Hansen AH, Halsne EG, Turner AT, Ruxin TR, Behrens KM, Lloyd AM, Childers WL, Brousseau L, Caputo JM, Hafner BJ, Morgenroth DC. Prosthetic foot preference associations with performance-based and patient-reported outcomes in persons with transtibial amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):55. (link to proceedings)
• Walker J, Marable WR, Smith C, Sigurjonsson BP, Atlason IF, Johannesson GA. Clinical outcome of transfemoral direct socket interface (part 2). J Prosthet Orthot. 2022; 34(2S):24. (link to proceedings)

2021

• Clemens S, Gaunaurd I, Klute G, Raya M, Kirk-Sanchez N, Gailey R. The use of theoretical frameworks to examine fall history and prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2S):19. (link to proceedings)
• Davies K, McClusky C, McGrath M, Stenson A, Singleton K, Moser D. The NHS England MPK Policy: does it provides sustained patient benefits? Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021; 45(1S):161. (link to proceedings)
• England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. Lifetime differences in mobility among lower limb prosthesis users. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2-S1):43. (link to proceedings)
• Esposito R, Slater B, Muschler K, Major M, Ikeda A, Hansen A, Erbes C. Perceived footwear limitations in women prosthesis users and the impact on patient reported outcomes. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2S):13. (link to proceedings)
• England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, Campbell JH, Wurdeman SR. Employment, gender, and geographic differences in mobility among lower limb prosthesis users. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2S):22. (link to proceedings)
• Gjøvaag T, Langseth II, Solberg MB, Starholm IM. Differences in self-reported mobility in persons with lower limb amputation using either a microprocessor or mechanical knee-joint. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021; 45(1S):56. (link to proceedings)
• Miller TA, Paul R, Forthofer M, Wurdman SR. The association of functional mobility and injurious falls among adults with lower limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2S):36. (link to proceedings)
• Morgenroth D, Halsne E, Turner A, Behrens K, Walker N, Hansen A, Brousseau L, Childers WL, Caputo J, Curran C, Hafner B. A novel test-drive strategy for prosthetic foot prescription: A randomized, cross-over predictive validity study. J Prosthet Orthot. 2021; 33(2S):37. (link to proceedings)
• Morgenroth D, Halsne E, Turner A, Walker N, Hansen A, Caputo J, Curran C, Hafner B. A randomized, cross-over predictive validity study of a novel test-drive strategy for prosthetic foot prescription. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021; 45(1S):122. (link to proceedings)

2020

• Chang S, Miller C, Kaluf B. Effects of hydraulic ankle-foot prostheses on gait in individuals with transtibial limb loss: A scoping review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):73. (link to proceedings)
• Kaluf B, Shoemaker E, Cox C. Hydraulic and microprocessor-controlled ankle-foot prostheses for limited community ambulators with unilateral transtibial amputation: Pilot study. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):74. (link to proceedings)
• Lundstrom R, Kort C, Sabolich S, Kannenberg A, Hibler K. Lower mobility level predicts clinical improvement after lower-limb prosthetic fittings: A three-year, multicenter, retrospective chart review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):23. (link to proceedings)
• Morris A, Mileusnic M, Kannenberg A, Schneider G, Gonzalez-Trejo E, Lundstrum R. Microprocessor knees for bilateral amputees. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):68. (link to proceedings)
• Seth M, Beisheim EH, Horne JR, Sions JM. Similar functional outcomes with vacuum-assisted and pin-lock suspension in adults with transtibial amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):12. (link to proceedings)
• Walker NR, Nickel EA, Santa Ana CK, Cataldo AY, Laine Dyeson MP, Gravely AA, Hand BD, Hansen AH. Comparison of 3D-printed and traditionally fabricated prosthetic sockets for users with transtibial amputations. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):35. (link to proceedings)
• Wurdeman SR, Miller T, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Microprocessor knee technology reduces odds of incurring injurious falls for diabetic/dysvascular amputees. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(2S):64. (link to proceedings)

2019

• Anderson CB, Wurdeman SR, Miller M, Colborn K, Stoneback J, Christiansen CL, Kittleson A. Development of a physical function prediction model to guide prosthetic rehabilitation after lower-limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019; 31(2S):25. (link to proceedings)
• Fujimoto K, Ojima I, Sana T, Konishi K. Correlation between mobility and quality of life for people with lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019; 73(S1):254. (link to proceedings)
• Gailey R, Kristal A, Al Muderis M, Lucarevic J, Clemens S, Applegate B, Isaacson B, Gaunaurd I. Mobility differences in transfemoral amputees with osseointegration versus traditional prosthetic sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int.2019; 73(S1):303. (link to proceedings)
• Lundstrom R, Sabolich S, Kanneberg A. Lower-limb prosthetics outcome measures: a retrospective chart review. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(2S):17. (link to proceedings)
• Hetherington A, Mamseri L, Mwakasungula G, Challa S, Albright P, Ali S, Andrysek J, Haonga B, Morshed S, Shearer D. Implementation of a research protocol to investigate quality of life, functional outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of above knee prostheses in Tanzania. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019; 73(S1):325. (link to proceedings)
• Starholm IM, Eidnes S, Ottersland K, Gjøvaag, T. An extended L–Test with multiple challenging walking situations – A pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019; 73(S1):80. (link to proceedings)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, England DL, Campbell JH. Matching individuals based on comorbid health reveals improved function for microprocessor knee users. J Prosthet Orthot. 2019; 31(2S):40. (link to proceedings)
• Zugner R, Malchau H, Mohaddes M, Tranberg R. Preliminary effects of the Xtend foot on walking patterns in amputees compared to their regular prosthetic foot. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019; 73(S1):483. (link to proceedings)

2018

• Akins JS, Poretti K, Eigenbrot S, Miller K, Russell M, Surratt K, Jenks T, Major MJ. Turning of individuals with lower-limb loss: preference and biomechanics. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(2S):25. (link to proceedings)
• Kaluf B. Comparative effectiveness of microprocessor and energy-storing prosthetic ankles: patient reported outcome measures. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(2S):32. (link to proceedings)
• Miller K, Russell M, Surratt K, Jenks T, Poretti K, Eigenbrot S, Akins J, Major MJ. Validity of a wearable sensor system for assessing balance in high-functioning lower-limb prosthesis users. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(2S):17. (link to proceedings)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM and Campbell JH. The presence of comorbidities does not preclude regular mobility for patients with lower limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(2S):24. (link to proceedings)
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM and Campbell JH. Quality of life and satisfaction are related to mobility for patients with a lower limb amputation. J Prosthet Orthot. 2018; 30(2S):23. (link to proceedings)

2017

• Agrawal V, Bennett C, Gaunaurd I, Lucarevic J, Qualls S, Finnieston A, Applegate B, Symsack A, Forthergill I, Gailey R. A novel auditory biofeedback system for improving amputee mobility in the home and community. Proceedings of the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association World Congress. Las Vegas, NV, September 6-9, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Cutti AG, Guida C, Bandoli S, Marchese C, Ferraro M, Di Bernardo A, Randi P, Branchini M, Vallone R, Amoresano A, Verni G. Selection and assessment of a set of outcome measures for electronically controlled knee users. Proceedings of the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association World Congress. Las Vegas, NV, September 6-9, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Gailey R, Lucarevic J, Clemens S, Agrawal V, Bennett C, Muderis A, Isaacson B, Pasquina P, Gaunaurd I. A comparison of prosthetic mobility in amputees with osseointegration versus traditional amputation and socket. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress. Cape Town, South Africa, May 8-10, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Gjøvaag T, Kroken KT, Normann SD, Güler E, Starholm IM. Classifying physical activity by accelerometry in persons with lower limb amputation: a pilot study. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress. Cape Town, South Africa, May 8-10, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Kaluf BD, DiGioia C, Shoemaker E, Martin TR, Leland RB, Bridges WC, Duncan A. Comparative effectiveness of microprocessor controlled and carbon fiber energy storing and returning prosthetic feet in persons with unilateral transtibial amputation. Proceedings of the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association World Congress. Las Vegas, NV, September 6-9, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Lundstrom R, Sabolich S, Kannenberg A. Lower limb outcome measures: a two-year retrospective chart review. Proceedings of the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association World Congress. Las Vegas, NV, September 6-9, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Mileusnic M. First clinical experiences with microprocessor controlled knee for moderately active transfemoral amputees. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress. Cape Town, South Africa, May 8-10, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Schwanborg L, Starhold IM, Steinsbekk A, Gjøvaag T. Formal translation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey (PLUS-M) and quantitative testing on a population of Norwegian prosthetic users. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress. Cape Town, South Africa, May 8-10, 2017. (link to proceedings)
• Wismer N. First user experiences with next generation of C-leg. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress. Cape Town, South Africa, May 8-10, 2017. (link to proceedings)

2015

• Fiedler G, Ortiz-Weissberg D. Peterson S. Suitability of step-by-step variability as an outcome variable for lower limb prosthesis alignment. AOPA National Assembly, San Antonio TX October 7-10, 2015. (link to proceedings)

PLUS-M in Theses & Student Projects

• Moller S. Functioning in prosthetic users provided with and without a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee - relative effects on mobility, self-efficacy, and attentional demand. Doctoral Thesis. Jonkoping University. 2019. (full thesis link)
• Kacar S. Construct validity and reliability of the lower extremity Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility. Thesis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Ankara, Turkey. 2019. (full thesis link)
• Schwanborg L. Assessment of the mobility of Norwegian lower limb prosthetic users and translation and validation of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey (PLUS-M). Master's Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Torndheim, 2016.
• Davie-Smith F. Factors influencing quality of life after lower extremity amputation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Doctoral thesis. University of Glasgow. 2017.
• Weingart A. A study of performance-based outcome measures used in the prosthetic field: Establishing normative values for transtibial amputees. Thesis. University of Florida. 2017.
• Visser M. The future of outcomes measurement: developing a strategic list of prosthetic outcome measures for a smart device application (app). Research project. George Brown College. May 6, 2016.

PLUS-M in Other Press

• Fiedler G. Vergleich der Versorgungsergebnisse mit verschiedenen trans-femoralen Schaftkonzepten [Outcome comparison of different trans-femoral socket designs], Orthopaedie-Technik, 04/15
• Fatone S. Efforts to improve outcome measurement in prosthetics and orthotics clinical practice. Northwestern University Grand Rounds. October 10, 2012. Chicago, IL.
  

Copyright © 2013 - All Rights Reserved - University of Washington

Template by OS Templates